Back to Compare

Baton vs Conductor

A side-by-side comparison of pricing, ratings, features, pros and cons.

Baton
BatonTafjord Invest ASFreemium
Conductor
ConductorConductorFreemium
DescriptionDesktop app running multiple AI coding agents in parallel, each in an isolated git worktree.macOS app for running multiple Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor agents in parallel, isolated workspaces.
Category
DeveloperTafjord Invest ASConductor
Verified StatusNoNo
Last UpdatedAug 2026Aug 2026
Pricing ModelFreemiumFreemium
Free PlanNoNo
Free TrialNoNo
Open SourceNoNo
API AccessNoNo
Features
Parallel AI coding agents in isolated git worktrees
Built-in Monaco code editor with diffs and commit history
Live browser preview linked to file changes
Support for Claude Code, Codex CLI, OpenCode, Gemini CLI
Network sandboxing with domain allowlisting
Free tier (4 workspaces) plus paid unlimited plans
Runs Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor agents in parallel
Isolated workspaces per agent
Real-time visibility into agent activity
Change review and merge tools
Free local tier plus Pro, Teams, and Enterprise plans
Tags
ai-coding-agentsparallel-agentsgit-worktreesdesktop-appdeveloper-tools
ai-coding-agentsparallel-agentsmacos-appclaude-codedeveloper-tools
Platforms
Mac
Mobile AppsNo
Review Count00
Saves00
Views69
Quality Score29/10029/100
Website StatusOnlineOnline
Websitegetbaton.devconductor.build
Social Links1 linked
ScreenshotsNoNo
Pros
Free to use
Free to use

Who Should Choose Each Tool?

Choose Baton if:

  • Free to use

Choose Conductor if:

  • Free to use

Frequently Asked Questions

Both tools are closely matched on rating — the better fit depends on your specific needs. See the full feature and pricing comparison above.

You can compare up to 4 tools — use "Add Tool" in the table above.

Disclosure: AlverHub may earn a commission if you sign up for a tool through a link on this page, at no additional cost to you. This never affects which tools we list or how we describe them — our recommendations are based on real, documented data and our published scoring methodology.