Back to Compare
Cody vs crit
A side-by-side comparison of pricing, ratings, features, pros and cons.
| Overview | |||
| Description | AI coding assistant by Sourcegraph with autocomplete, chat, and codebase-aware answers. | Human-in-the-loop review for AI coding agents. Annotate plans, code, or any file with inline comments in a local browser UI; exports structured JSON your agent reads back. Share reviews via URL. | |
| Category | |||
| Developer | Sourcegraph | Tomasz Tomczyk | |
| Verified Status | No | No | |
| Last Updated | Aug 2026 | Aug 2026 | |
| Pricing | |||
| Pricing Model | Pricing not yet verified | Open Source | |
| Free Plan | No | Yes | |
| Free Trial | — | No | |
| Open Source | — | Yes | |
| Capabilities | |||
| API Access | — | No | |
| Features | • AI code autocomplete • AI chat grounded in your codebase • Codebase-aware answers | • Local-first browser review for AI agent output • Four review modes: plans, diffs, live apps, HTML • Line-level, persistent multi-round commenting • Works with Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot • Zero telemetry, runs on localhost • Free, open source, single-binary CLI | |
| Tags | codycodingassistant | crithumanloopreviewcodingagents | |
| Trust and Engagement | |||
| Review Count | 0 | 0 | |
| Saves | 0 | 0 | |
| Views | 35 | 8 | |
| Quality Score | 58/100 | 49/100 | |
| Website Status | Online | Online | |
| Availability | |||
| Website | about.sourcegraph.com | crit.md | |
| Social Links | 2 linked | 3 linked | |
| Screenshots | No | No | |
| Reviews | |||
| Pros | — | • Free to use | |
Ready to Try These Tools?
Alternatives to Consider
Frequently Asked Questions
Both tools are closely matched on rating — the better fit depends on your specific needs. See the full feature and pricing comparison above.
You can compare up to 4 tools — use "Add Tool" in the table above.
Disclosure: AlverHub may earn a commission if you sign up for a tool through a link on this page, at no additional cost to you. This never affects which tools we list or how we describe them — our recommendations are based on real, documented data and our published scoring methodology.





