Back to Compare

Conductor vs Kagan

A side-by-side comparison of pricing, ratings, features, pros and cons.

Conductor
ConductorConductorFreemium
DescriptionmacOS app for running multiple Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor agents in parallel, isolated workspaces.AI-powered Kanban TUI for autonomous development workflows. Integrates with Claude Code and OpenCode for ticket-driven AI coding with git worktree isolation and MCP server support.
Category
DeveloperConductor
Verified StatusNoNo
Last UpdatedAug 2026Aug 2026
Pricing ModelFreemiumFree
Free PlanNoYes
Free TrialNo
Open SourceNoNo
API AccessNo
Features
Runs Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor agents in parallel
Isolated workspaces per agent
Real-time visibility into agent activity
Change review and merge tools
Free local tier plus Pro, Teams, and Enterprise plans
Tags
ai-coding-agentsparallel-agentsmacos-appclaude-codedeveloper-tools
kaganpoweredkanbanautonomousdevelopmentworkflows
Platforms
Mac
Mobile AppsNo
Review Count00
Saves00
Views939
Quality Score29/10062/100
Website StatusOnlineOnline
Websiteconductor.buildgithub.com
Social Links1 linked1 linked
ScreenshotsNoNo
Pros
Free to use
Free to use

Who Should Choose Each Tool?

Choose Conductor if:

  • Free to use

Choose Kagan if:

  • Free to use

Frequently Asked Questions

Both tools are closely matched on rating — the better fit depends on your specific needs. See the full feature and pricing comparison above.

You can compare up to 4 tools — use "Add Tool" in the table above.

Disclosure: AlverHub may earn a commission if you sign up for a tool through a link on this page, at no additional cost to you. This never affects which tools we list or how we describe them — our recommendations are based on real, documented data and our published scoring methodology.