Back to Compare

Continue vs Lunary

A side-by-side comparison of pricing, ratings, features, pros and cons.

Continue
ContinueContinueOpen Source
Lunary
LunaryLunaryOpen Source
DescriptionOpen-source AI code assistant. Connect any model and any context to create custom autocomplete and chat experiences inside the IDE.Open-source platform for LLM chatbots and agents: observability, prompt management, testing & more
Category
DeveloperContinueLunary
Verified StatusNoNo
Last UpdatedSep 2026Sep 2026
Pricing ModelOpen SourceOpen Source
Free PlanYesYes
Open SourceYesYes
Features
Model-agnostic — connect any hosted or self-hosted AI model
In-IDE autocomplete
In-IDE chat interface
VS Code and JetBrains extension
Local/self-hosted model support for code privacy
Open source and community-extensible
Tags
continuecodeassistantconnectopen-source
lunarychatbotsagentsobservabilityopen-source
Review Count00
Saves00
Views10459
Quality Score62/10058/100
Website StatusOnlineOnline
Websitewww.continue.devlunary.ai
Social Links3 linked
ScreenshotsNoNo
Pros
Free to use
Free to use

Who Should Choose Each Tool?

Choose Continue if:

  • Free to use

Choose Lunary if:

  • Free to use

Related Comparisons

Continue vs aider

Frequently Asked Questions

Both tools are closely matched on rating — the better fit depends on your specific needs. See the full feature and pricing comparison above.

You can compare up to 4 tools — use "Add Tool" in the table above.

Disclosure: AlverHub may earn a commission if you sign up for a tool through a link on this page, at no additional cost to you. This never affects which tools we list or how we describe them — our recommendations are based on real, documented data and our published scoring methodology.