Back to Compare

Cursor vs OpenAI Codex

A side-by-side comparison of pricing, ratings, features, pros and cons.

Cursor
CursorCursorFreemium
OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexOpenaiUnknown
DescriptionAI-powered code editor built on autonomous coding agents, used for building, reviewing, and shipping software end-to-end.OpenAI's open-source terminal coding agent that reads, edits, tests, and opens pull requests across a full codebase from natural-language instructions.
Category
DeveloperCursorOpenai
Verified Status
Last UpdatedSep 2026Sep 2026
Pricing ModelFreemiumPricing not yet verified
Free PlanNoNo
Open SourceNo
Features
Autonomous coding agents for end-to-end feature building
Cloud agents that run multiple tasks in parallel
Support for multiple AI models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, and Cursor's own)
Composer for building features end-to-end
Automated code review
Integrations with CLI, Slack, GitHub, and iOS
Desktop IDE plus multi-surface access
Autonomous terminal agent: reads, edits, tests, and opens PRs
AGENTS.md for persistent repo-specific instructions
.codex/skills for reusable custom agent capabilities
Model Context Protocol (MCP) server support
Available via CLI, VS Code (9.8M installs), web, iOS, and Amazon Bedrock
Token-based credit pricing; Free tier plus $20-$200/month plans
Tags
cursorcollaborativecode-editor
systemtranslatesnatural-languageopenai-codex
Review Count00
Saves00
Views156112
Quality Score45/10049/100
Website StatusOnlineOnline
Websitewww.cursor.soplatform.openai.com
Social Links3 linked2 linked
ScreenshotsYesNo
Pros
Free to use

Screenshots

CursorCursor

Frequently Asked Questions

Both tools are closely matched on rating — the better fit depends on your specific needs. See the full feature and pricing comparison above.

You can compare up to 4 tools — use "Add Tool" in the table above.

Disclosure: AlverHub may earn a commission if you sign up for a tool through a link on this page, at no additional cost to you. This never affects which tools we list or how we describe them — our recommendations are based on real, documented data and our published scoring methodology.