Back to Compare

Cursor vs Trae

A side-by-side comparison of pricing, ratings, features, pros and cons.

Cursor
CursorCursorFreemium
Trae
TraeTraeFree
DescriptionAI-powered code editor built on autonomous coding agents, used for building, reviewing, and shipping software end-to-end.ByteDance's free AI-native code editor (a VS Code fork) offering autocomplete, multi-file editing, and an autonomous "SOLO" agent for full-task automation.
Category
DeveloperCursorTrae
Verified Status
Last UpdatedJul 2026Jul 2026
Pricing ModelFreemiumFree
Free PlanNoYes
Open SourceNoNo
Features
Autonomous coding agents for end-to-end feature building
Cloud agents that run multiple tasks in parallel
Support for multiple AI models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, and Cursor's own)
Composer for building features end-to-end
Automated code review
Integrations with CLI, Slack, GitHub, and iOS
Desktop IDE plus multi-surface access
VS Code fork with AI autocomplete, chat, and multi-file Builder mode
SOLO: autonomous agent for full task automation (requirements to deployment)
Access to Claude, GPT-4o, DeepSeek R1, and ByteDance Doubao models
Free tier: 5,000 autocompletions/month with premium model access
Trae SOLO Web: cloud-based version requiring no local install
Tags
cursorcollaborativecodeeditor
traecodingbytedancehelpfulpartneroffers
Review Count00
Saves00
Views1510
Quality Score45/10049/100
Website StatusOnlineOnline
Websitewww.cursor.sowww.trae.ai
Social Links3 linked
ScreenshotsNoNo
Pros
Free to use
Free to use

Frequently Asked Questions

Both tools are closely matched on rating — the better fit depends on your specific needs. See the full feature and pricing comparison above.

You can compare up to 4 tools — use "Add Tool" in the table above.

Disclosure: AlverHub may earn a commission if you sign up for a tool through a link on this page, at no additional cost to you. This never affects which tools we list or how we describe them — our recommendations are based on our own research and testing criteria.