Back to Compare
Dyad vs Kagan
A side-by-side comparison of pricing, ratings, features, pros and cons.
| Overview | |||
| Description | Local-first AI app builder that turns natural-language ideas into working web apps with full code ownership. | AI-powered Kanban TUI for autonomous development workflows. Integrates with Claude Code and OpenCode for ticket-driven AI coding with git worktree isolation and MCP server support. | |
| Category | |||
| Developer | Dyad Tech, Inc. | — | |
| Verified Status | No | No | |
| Last Updated | Aug 2026 | Aug 2026 | |
| Pricing | |||
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Free | |
| Free Plan | No | Yes | |
| Free Trial | No | — | |
| Open Source | No | No | |
| Capabilities | |||
| API Access | No | — | |
| Features | • Generates working web apps from natural-language descriptions • Local-first, offline-capable operation • Compatible with Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, and Ollama • One-click Supabase/Neon database and auth integration • One-click deployment to GitHub and Vercel • 100% open-source with exportable, ownership-retaining code | — | |
| Tags | ai-app-builderno-codelocal-firstopen-sourcecode-generation | kaganpoweredkanbanautonomousdevelopmentworkflows | |
| Platforms | Web | — | |
| Mobile Apps | No | — | |
| Trust and Engagement | |||
| Review Count | 0 | 0 | |
| Saves | 0 | 0 | |
| Views | 8 | 39 | |
| Quality Score | 29/100 | 62/100 | |
| Website Status | Online | Online | |
| Availability | |||
| Website | www.dyad.sh | github.com | |
| Social Links | 2 linked | 1 linked | |
| Screenshots | No | No | |
| Reviews | |||
| Pros | • Free to use | • Free to use | |
Ready to Try These Tools?
Alternatives to Consider
Frequently Asked Questions
Both tools are closely matched on rating — the better fit depends on your specific needs. See the full feature and pricing comparison above.
You can compare up to 4 tools — use "Add Tool" in the table above.
Disclosure: AlverHub may earn a commission if you sign up for a tool through a link on this page, at no additional cost to you. This never affects which tools we list or how we describe them — our recommendations are based on real, documented data and our published scoring methodology.