Back to Compare
firefly vs GitHub - Sanster/lama-cleaner
A side-by-side comparison of pricing, ratings, features, pros and cons.
| Overview | |||
| Description | Adobe's AI image processing web site | Image inpainting tool powered by SOTA AI Model | |
| Category | |||
| Developer | Adobe | — | |
| Verified Status | No | No | |
| Last Updated | Sep 2026 | Sep 2026 | |
| Pricing | |||
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Pricing not yet verified | |
| Free Plan | No | No | |
| Open Source | No | — | |
| Capabilities | |||
| Features | • Generative Fill and Generative Expand inside Photoshop • Trained on Adobe Stock and licensed/public domain content • IP indemnification for generated content on paid plans • Integrated into Illustrator, Express, and other Creative Cloud apps • Standalone web app in addition to in-app integration | • AI-powered image inpainting to remove objects, watermarks, or people from photos • Built on the LaMa inpainting model, with support for additional models • Runs locally, including with GPU acceleration, without uploading images to the cloud • Simple brush-based interface for marking areas to remove or edit • Free and open source | |
| Tags | fireflyadobeimageprocessingsite | githubsansterimageinpaintinglama-cleaner | |
| Trust and Engagement | |||
| Review Count | 0 | 0 | |
| Saves | 0 | 0 | |
| Views | 66 | 53 | |
| Quality Score | 58/100 | 58/100 | |
| Website Status | Online | Online | |
| Availability | |||
| Website | firefly.adobe.com | github.com | |
| Social Links | — | 1 linked | |
| Screenshots | No | No | |
| Reviews | |||
| Pros | • Free to use | — | |
Ready to Try These Tools?
Alternatives to Consider
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Both tools are closely matched on rating — the better fit depends on your specific needs. See the full feature and pricing comparison above.
You can compare up to 4 tools — use "Add Tool" in the table above.
Disclosure: AlverHub may earn a commission if you sign up for a tool through a link on this page, at no additional cost to you. This never affects which tools we list or how we describe them — our recommendations are based on real, documented data and our published scoring methodology.