Back to Compare

Nimbalyst vs Proxed.AI

A side-by-side comparison of pricing, ratings, features, pros and cons.

Nimbalyst
NimbalystNimbalystOpen Source
Proxed.AI
Proxed.AINech.AIFreemium
DescriptionOpen-source visual workspace that pairs Claude Code and Codex agents with collaborative editing tools.Open-source security proxy protecting AI API keys in mobile apps with Apple DeviceCheck and one-line integration.
Category
DeveloperNimbalystNech.AI
Verified StatusNoNo
Last UpdatedSep 2026Sep 2026
Pricing ModelOpen SourceFreemium
Free PlanYesNo
Free TrialNoNo
Open SourceYesNo
API AccessNoNo
Features
Integrates Claude Code and Codex agents with visual editors
Parallel agent session management on a kanban board
Visible file diffs for reviewing AI edits before applying
Integrated task tracking and collaborative documents
Extension system for custom editors
Local-first, MIT-licensed, and free for individuals
Split-Key Architecture protecting API keys
Apple DeviceCheck hardware authentication
Intelligent rate limiting and cost controls
One-line proxy URL integration
OpenAI and Anthropic model proxying
Free self-hosted, $25-300/year hosted plans
Tags
ai-coding-agentopen-sourcevisual-workspaceclaude-codecollaborative-editing
api-key-securitymobile-ai-proxyopen-sourceapple-devicecheckdeveloper-security-tools
Review Count00
Saves00
Views5035
Quality Score57/10029/100
Website StatusOnlineOnline
Websitenimbalyst.comproxed.ai
Social Links3 linked2 linked
ScreenshotsNoNo
Pros
Free to use
Free to use

Who Should Choose Each Tool?

Choose Nimbalyst if:

  • Free to use

Choose Proxed.AI if:

  • Free to use

Frequently Asked Questions

Both tools are closely matched on rating — the better fit depends on your specific needs. See the full feature and pricing comparison above.

You can compare up to 4 tools — use "Add Tool" in the table above.

Disclosure: AlverHub may earn a commission if you sign up for a tool through a link on this page, at no additional cost to you. This never affects which tools we list or how we describe them — our recommendations are based on real, documented data and our published scoring methodology.