Back to Compare

codex-plugin-cc vs Magick

A side-by-side comparison of pricing, ratings, features, pros and cons.

MagickMagickmlUnknown
DescriptionClaude Code plugin that enables using OpenAI Codex for code reviews and task delegation directly within Claude Code workflow. Provides /codex:review, /codex:adversarial-review and other commandsVisual, node-based IDE for designing, developing, and deploying AI agents without writing code.
Category
DeveloperopenaiMagickml
Verified StatusNo
Last UpdatedSep 2026Sep 2026
Pricing ModelFreePricing not yet verified
Free PlanYesNo
Open SourceNo
Features
/codex:review — read-only Codex code review of uncommitted changes or a branch diff
/codex:adversarial-review — steerable review that challenges design decisions and specific risk areas
/codex:rescue, /codex:transfer, /codex:status, /codex:result, /codex:cancel for delegating and managing background Codex tasks
Installs as a Claude Code plugin via the marketplace (/plugin marketplace add, /plugin install)
Requires a ChatGPT subscription (including free tier) or OpenAI API key, plus Node.js 18.18+
Usage counts against the user's existing Codex usage limits
Visual, node-based agent builder
Multi-LLM support (GPT-4, Claude, open-source models)
Document processing and analysis
Discord and Unreal Engine integrations
Open source
Tags
codexpluginreviewenablesclaude-code
Review Count00
Saves00
Views99103
Quality Score70/10018/100
Website StatusOnlineOnline
Websitegithub.comwww.magickml.com
Social Links1 linked1 linked
ScreenshotsYesNo
Pros
Free to use

Screenshots

codex-plugin-cccodex-plugin-cc

Frequently Asked Questions

Both tools are closely matched on rating — the better fit depends on your specific needs. See the full feature and pricing comparison above.

You can compare up to 4 tools — use "Add Tool" in the table above.

Disclosure: AlverHub may earn a commission if you sign up for a tool through a link on this page, at no additional cost to you. This never affects which tools we list or how we describe them — our recommendations are based on real, documented data and our published scoring methodology.